Jonathan Cameron wrote on 2012-05-04: > On 5/4/2012 2:31 PM, michael.hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Michael Hennerich<michael.hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx> > Before I dive in here too far, let me ask the stupid question. > > Whilst I know nothing much about it, why is the kernel's clock framework > unsuitable for this device? Hi Jonathan, I think we had a similar discussion before. The in-kernel clock infrastructure HAVE_CLK <linux/clk.h> is not suitable since it is designed for SoC like systems. 1) The API is exported by arch and platform code. 2) Data structures differ between the different implementations. 3) Coexistence with other clock providers is by design impossible. Greetings, Michael -- Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368; Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
