On 04/25/2012 04:57 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 4/25/2012 1:18 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> Currently we use two different naming schemes in the IIO API, >> iio_verb_object >> and iio_object_verb. E.g iio_device_register and iio_allocate_device. >> This >> patches renames instances of the later to the former. The patch also >> renames allocate to >> alloc as this seems to be the preferred form throughout the kernel. >> >> In particular the following renames are performed by the patch: >> iio_put_device -> iio_device_put >> iio_allocate_device -> iio_device_alloc >> iio_free_device -> iio_device_free >> iio_get_trigger -> iio_trigger_get >> iio_put_trigger -> iio_trigger_put >> iio_allocate_trigger -> iio_trigger_alloc >> iio_free_trigger -> iio_trigger_free >> >> The conversion was done with the following coccinelle patch with >> manual fixes to >> comments and documentation. > I'm entirely in favour of this. Actually did half of them in the > original attempt to move out of staging but never pulled back into > the main tree! > > Assuming Greg merges the series that I just sent out to move the core > out of staging, could you regenerate against the files in their new > locations? > Yes, sure. I think git may even be able to track the rename, so rebasing the patch shouldn't be much of a problem. - Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
