Re: RFC: Does separate types for differential signals make sense?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/18/2011 12:18 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
Hi All,

Whilst working on some of the capacitance adc drivers yesterday I added a second
differential type.   Whilst we only had IIO_VOlTAGE_DIFF, it seemed easier to
handle it as a special case - now we have IIO_CAPACITANCE_DIFF, I'm not so sure.
IIO_CURRENT_DIFF is also likely to be added in future...

The alternative is to add another flag to struct iio_chan_spec and build the
differential names automatically (easy enough I think).  Nastier is how to handle
the related event codes.  As we haven't pushed out the new 64 bit codes, this
is a perfect time to slip in a change there (rather than two changes back to back.)
Current macro to generate codes is:

define IIO_EVENT_CODE(chan_type, modifier, direction,			\
		       type, chan, chan1, chan2)			\
	(((u64)type<<  56) | ((u64)direction<<  48) | ((u64)modifier<<  40) | \
	 ((u64)chan_type<<  32) | (chan2<<  16) | chan1 | chan)

So if we were to steal a bit to mark channels as differential, where would we do it?
Obvious choice is in type - reducing max number of types to 128 - can't see that being
a problem any time soon.  Could pinch the top bit off direction instead - that one
has way more values than I can think of uses for...
In the way we use chan_type today - I think it would be the best spot.
This is going to be an annoyingly invasive patch to do. I'll probably scrap the
use of the IIO_CHAN macro for all differential channels rather than adding another
parameter to it. Plan was to scrap that macro entirely eventually, so not such a
bad thing.

Jonathan




--
Greetings,
Michael

--
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368;
Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin,
Margaret Seif


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux