RE: naming IIO_IN_DIFF in-in

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Cameron wrote on 2011-06-07:
> On 06/07/11 10:00, Michael Hennerich wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> I wonder if naming IIO_IN_DIFF in-in is really a good idea.
>> Declaring the attribute in a conventional fashion doesn't work.
>>
>> static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(in-in_scale_available, S_IRUGO, \
>> ad7793_show_scale_available, NULL, 0);
> Yup, that's why we have IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED.
>
> static IIO_DEVICE_ATTR_NAMED(in_m_in_scale_available, in-
> in_scale_available, S_IRUGO, ad7793_show_scale_available, NULL, 0)
>
> should give you an iio_dev_attr_in_m_in_scale_available to use in the
> attribute table.  It will show up in sysfs as in-in_scale_available.


Hi Jonathan,

Thanks!


>>
>> static struct attribute *ad7793_attributes[] = {
>> &iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency.dev_attr.attr,
>> &iio_const_attr_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr,
>> &iio_dev_attr_in-in_scale_available.dev_attr.attr,
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7793.c:681: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
>> 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '-' token
>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7793.c:688: error: 'iio_dev_attr_in'
>> undeclared here (not in a function)
>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7793.c:688: error: 'in_scale_available'
>> undeclared here (not in a function)
>>
>

Greetings,
Michael

--
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen; Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 40368; Geschaeftsfuehrer:Dr.Carsten Suckrow, Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux