On 05/18/11 16:25, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:40:50PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Dear Greg, >> >> Here is the set I mentioned was coming. >> >> Thomas Gleixner just pushed the required irq patches to the tip tree >> (though they aren't visible yet). >> >> [tip:irq/core] genirq: Uninline and sanity check generic_handle_irq() >> fe12bc2c996d3e492b2920e32ac79f7bbae3e15d >> >> and >> >> [tip:irq/core] irq: Export functions to allow modular irq drivers >> edf76f8307c350bcb81f0c760118a991b3e62956 >> >> There are two other dependencies. One is a trivial missing header >> in arm (patch on it's way through the arm tree). Doesn't break building >> except on arm anyway. >> >> The other is the strtobool that you added to driver-core >> Add a strtobool function matching semantics of existing in kernel equivalents >> ad58671cf32c74a8d6e8f51e63e9cf4e7a73bf1e > > Hm, this is going to be "interesting" then. I'll see if I can pull > these patches into my staging-next tree, or if I can just wait for them > to be merged before staging-next and hope that linux-next all works fine > for everyone... > I 'think' they all apply directly to current mainline and that nothing else has changed in the relevant areas for a little while, so with a bit of luck they should be cherry-pickable directly into staging-next Or as you say, wait for them to merge which I'd imagine will happen fairly soon anyway. Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
