On 06/01/2025 08:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Use a plain BLK_MQ_F_* flag to select the round robin tag selection
instead of overlaying an enum with just two possible values into the
flags space.
Doing so allows adding a BLK_MQ_F_MAX sentinel for simplified overflow
checking in the messy debugfs helpers.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
Looks fine, but some small comments still. However, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
/*
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
index 72c03cbdaff4..935b13e79dec 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c
@@ -378,7 +378,6 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template sil24_sht = {
.can_queue = SIL24_MAX_CMDS,
.sg_tablesize = SIL24_MAX_SGE,
.dma_boundary = ATA_DMA_BOUNDARY,
- .tag_alloc_policy = BLK_TAG_ALLOC_FIFO,
nit: maybe that could be a separate patch, but no biggie
.sdev_groups = ata_ncq_sdev_groups,
.change_queue_depth = ata_scsi_change_queue_depth,
.device_configure = ata_scsi_device_configure
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
index 79129c977704..35501d0aa655 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
@@ -438,8 +438,10 @@ struct scsi_host_template {
*/
short cmd_per_lun;
- /* If use block layer to manage tags, this is tag allocation policy */
- int tag_alloc_policy;
+ /*
+ * Allocate tags starting from last allocated tag.
+ */
+ bool tag_alloc_policy_rr : 1;
Is it proper to use bool here? I am not sure. Others use unsigned int or
unsigned.
nit: coding style elsewhere in scsi_host_template would be to use
"tag_alloc_policy_rr:1;"
/*
* Track QUEUE_FULL events and reduce queue depth on demand.