Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: qcom: {a,i}pq8064: correct clock-names in sata node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Rayyan Ansari wrote:
> 
> Hi Niklas,
> 
> Yes, this patch does not depend on the following two patches, I just
> thought that sending this as a series would make sense given that
> patches 2-3 would surface this error (as we can run dtbs_check against
> yaml bindings but not text bindings).

Usually, DT maintainers prefer for DT bindings to go via subsystem trees
(in this case libata).

I guess DT maintainers could have picked the whole series, as they do
occasionally, but they seem to want to avoid this as much as possible.


In this case, considering that the DTS change (patch 1/3) is a strict fix,
I think that it should be merged ASAP (target 6.11 instead of 6.12).

We will queue the DT binding changes for 6.12.

When also taking into consideration that the DT bindings and DTS changes
have different trees, splitting the series was probably the right move.


Kind regards,
Niklas




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux