Arnd, Are we continuing this patch series ? You are silent since last version submit, which makes me a bit worried. If you suddenly changed your mind please let us know, cause anyway we have no possibility to merge these series without you. On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 11:21 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:29:44AM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 19:20 +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote: > > > Hello Andy! > > > On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:58 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:38 AM Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay > > > > <devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to > > > > > merge it > > > > > via Arnd branch. > > > > > > > > 'receive' > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, CLK subsystem suddenly went silent on clk > > > > > portion > > > > > of > > > > > series V2 reroll, > > > > > tried to ping them for about a month but no luck. > > > > > > > > > > Link: > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240408-ep93xx-clk-v2-1-adcd68c13753@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > Some changes since last version (v9) - see "Changes in v10", > > > > > mostly > > > > > cosmetic. > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > Patches should be formated with '--histogram' > > > > > > > > 'formatted' > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > Changes in v10: > > > > > > > > > > Reordered SoB tags to make sure they appear before Rb and > > > > > Acked > > > > > tags. > > > > > > > > This is not required. The importance is only the order of SoBs > > > > themselves. If they are interleaved with other tags, it's fine. > > > > > > Ah - ok. Just saw someone was complaining about b4 reordering > > > them. > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully to see this series being eventually applied soon. > > > > Arnd? (Do we have all necessary subsystem maintainers' tags, > > > > btw?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As i see from my perspective only three left: > > > > > > Clk subsystem: > > > > > > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx > > > > > > DMA subsystem (but the only request from Vinod, as far as i > > > remember, > > > was fixing commits titles): > > > > > > - dmaengine: cirrus: Convert to DT for Cirrus EP93xx > > > - dmaengine: cirrus: remove platform code > > > > > > Beside that tags missing on platform code removal (which can be > > > Acked > > > by Arnd himself i believe) and dtsi/dts files (same ?). > > > > Vinod acked the above two patches: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkIp8bOcZK3yVKP@matsya/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZnkImp8BtTdxl7O3@matsya/ > > > > so only: > > > > - clk: ep93xx: add DT support for Cirrus EP93xx > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617-ep93xx-v10-3-662e640ed811@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > left. > > > > Hope Stephen will find some time for this one. > > As we're approaching the merge window and this is still unclear, I > applied the pwm bits (i.e. patches 12, 13). If I understand > correctly, > patch 33 isn't suitable for application yet as it has a dependency on > pinctrl changes in that series. > > (side note: Your patches are signed, but that doesn't bring any > benefit > if the receivers don't have your key. I didn't find it neither on > keys.openpgp.org nor in the kernel pgp key collection.) > > Best regards > Uwe
