On 2024/06/24 22:27, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> We got another report that CT1000BX500SSD1 does not work with LPM.
>
> If you look in libata-core.c, we have six different Crucial devices that
> are marked with ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM. This model would have been the seventh.
> (This quirk is used on Crucial models starting with both CT* and
> Crucial_CT*)
>
> It is obvious that this vendor does not have a great history of supporting
> LPM properly, therefore, add the ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM quirk for all Crucial
> BX SSD1 models.
>
> Fixes: 7627a0edef54 ("ata: ahci: Drop low power policy board type")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: Tkd-Alex <alex.tkd.alex@xxxxxxxxx>
We need a real full name here, not a user name... So if Alex is not willing to
send his full name, please remove this.
Other than that, looks good. That was strike 3 for this series of SSDs, so I
agree that taking the big hammer and disabling LPM for all of them is the right
thing to do. If the device vendor wants to help with this, we can refine this later.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218832
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> index e1bf8a19b3c8..efb5195da60c 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -4137,8 +4137,7 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = {
> { "PIONEER BD-RW BDR-205", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM },
>
> /* Crucial devices with broken LPM support */
> - { "CT500BX100SSD1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM },
> - { "CT240BX500SSD1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM },
> + { "CT*0BX*00SSD1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM },
>
> /* 512GB MX100 with MU01 firmware has both queued TRIM and LPM issues */
> { "Crucial_CT512MX100*", "MU01", ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
