On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 1:55 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What changelog? Read carefully what I asked you few versions ago: Below the sign off I have added changes done in all the versions before and explained why imx51-pata was added. > "Please explain the differences done during conversion in the commit > msg. There was no imx51 compatible in the binding before." "" Changes in v4: - added fsl,imx31-pata in compatible property as enum - imx31-pata was not listed in compatible in original txt binding - adding imx31-pata in enum ensures the node compiles to imx31.dtsi Changes in v3: - added fsl,imx51-pata in compatible property as enum - imx51-pata was not listed in compatible in original txt binding - adding imx51-pata in enum ensures the node compiles to imx51.dtsi - fsl,imx27-pata is added as a const to ensure it is present always "" Aren't these lines enough for the said explanation? Thanks & Regards Animesh
