Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Power management fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, this part of the problem can be avoided by adding an explicit entry
> that uses "board_ahci_low_power", as I explained in:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/ZaATdGDOo5jiBqCR@x1-carbon/T/#u[https://lore.kernel.org/linux-> ide/ZaATdGDOo5jiBqCR@x1-carbon/T/#u]

> We seem to have a problem with Tiger Lake, but that problem seems to be
> related to Intel VMD.

> From looking at your logs, you don't seem to have Intel VMD, however
> I'm guessing that some other motherboards that uses Cannon Lake might
> have Intel VMD, so I guess the safest thing is to wait until that issue
> has been resolved before adding a "board_ahci_low_power" entry for
> Cannon Lake.

This mighht be kind of naive but what about adding an kernel option to force LPM even if the chipset/board is not oficially supported?

> I see now that Damien's revert (patch 2/2 in this series) is not a simple
> $ git revert fd3a6837d8e18cb7be80dcca1283276290336a7a
> it seems to have some other small changes in the same patch as well.

> Sorry for asking you to test something once more...
> But could you please test with:
> v6.6-rc2 + git revert fd3a6837d8e18cb7be80dcca1283276290336a7a

No problem. I've explicitly reverted with 6.8-rc2 and have the kernel running for 1 1/2 days now with 3 suspends and on all of them my system transitions to pc8 so I guess we're good but I'll keep on testing to be sure. Hope this helps.

Kind regards,
Dieter




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux