On 7/19/23 19:03, 杜敏杰 wrote:
> It is possible for dma_request_chan() to return EPROBE_DEFER, which means
> acdev->host->dev is not ready yet.
> At this point dev_err() will have no output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <duminjie@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V1 - V3:
> Fix code format.
> ---
> drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c
> index 6ab294322..c85932c20 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_arasan_cf.c
> @@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ static void data_xfer(struct work_struct *work)
> /* dma_request_channel may sleep, so calling from process context */
> acdev->dma_chan = dma_request_chan(acdev->host->dev, "data");
> if (IS_ERR(acdev->dma_chan)) {
> - dev_err(acdev->host->dev, "Unable to get dma_chan\n");
> + dev_err_probe(acdev->host->dev, PTR_ERR(acdev->dma_chan),
> + "Unable to get dma_chan\n")
Seriously ? You keep resending the same. Still not aligned. And even
worse: this will not even compile as this is missing ";".
Please improve your process and (1) act on comments and (2) properly
test your changes.
> acdev->dma_chan = NULL;
> goto chan_request_fail;
> }
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
