Re: [PATCH v3 01/18] block: introduce duration-limits priority class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:19:45AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 1/25/23 09:05, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> 
> > which it is not sure that it will be integrated in other storage 
> > standards (NVMe, ...). Isn't the purpose of the block layer to provide 
> > an interface that is independent of the specifics of a single storage 
> > standard? This is why I'm in favor of letting the ATA core translate one 
> > of the existing I/O priority classes into a CDL instead of introducing a 
> > new I/O priority class (IOPRIO_CLASS_DL) in the block layer.
> 
> We discussed CDL with Hannes in the context of NVMe over fabrics. Their
> may be interesting extensions to consider for NVMe in that context (the
> value for local PCI attached NVMe drive is more limited at best).

I wouldn't necessarily rule out CDL for PCI attached in some future TP. NVMe
does allow rotating media, and they'll want feature parity if CDL is considered
useful in other protocols.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux