On 10/31/22 02:53, Damien Le Moal wrote:
If a user issues a write command with the FUA bit set for a device with NCQ support disabled (that is, the device queue depth was set to 1), the LBA 48 command WRITE DMA FUA EXT must be used. However, ata_build_rw_tf() ignores this and first tests if LBA 28 can be used based on the write command sector and number of blocks. That is, for small FUA writes at low LBAs, ata_rwcmd_protocol() will cause the write to fail. Fix this by preventing the use of LBA 28 for any FUA write request. Given that the WRITE MULTI FUA EXT command is marked as obsolete iin the ATA specification since ACS-3 (published in 2013), remove the ATA_CMD_WRITE_MULTI_FUA_EXT command from the ata_rw_cmds array. Finally, since the block layer should never issue a FUA read request, warn in ata_build_rw_tf() if we see such request. Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer
