Re: [PATCH] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: remove variable num_processed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/24/22 23:17, Colin Ian King wrote:
> Variable num_processed is just being incremented and it's never used
> anywhere else. The variable and the increment are redundant so
> remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied to for-6.2. Thanks !

> ---
>  drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
> index e3263e961045..fd699c5bfc34 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
> @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sata_dwc_isr(int irq, void *dev_instance)
>  	struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	u8 status, tag;
> -	int handled, num_processed, port = 0;
> +	int handled, port = 0;
>  	uint intpr, sactive, sactive2, tag_mask;
>  	struct sata_dwc_device_port *hsdevp;
>  	hsdev->sactive_issued = 0;
> @@ -618,9 +618,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sata_dwc_isr(int irq, void *dev_instance)
>  	dev_dbg(ap->dev, "%s ATA status register=0x%x\n", __func__, status);
>  
>  	tag = 0;
> -	num_processed = 0;
>  	while (tag_mask) {
> -		num_processed++;
>  		while (!(tag_mask & 0x00000001)) {
>  			tag++;
>  			tag_mask <<= 1;

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux