On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 16:06, Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:22:38AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 09:53, Damien Le Moal
> > <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/14/22 16:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, at 2:22 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > > >> On 10/14/22 07:07, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > >> [...]
> > > >>>> 8)
> > > >>>>> If reverting these patches restores the eSATA port on this board, then you need
> > > >>>>> to fix the defconfig for that board.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> OTOH,
> > > >>>> Anders, enabled the new config CONFIG_AHCI_DWC=y and tried but the
> > > >>>> device failed to boot.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I thought it would work with enabling CONFIG_AHCI_DWC=y, but it didn't...
> > > >>
> > > >> As mentioned in my previous reply to Naresh, this is a new driver added in
> > > >> 6.1. Your board was working before so this should not be the driver needed
> > > >> for it.
> > > >>
> > > >>> However, reverting patch 33629d35090f ("ata: ahci: Add DWC AHCI SATA
> > > >>> controller support")
> > > >>> from next-20221013 was a success, kernel booted and the 'mkfs.ext4' cmd was
> > > >>> successful.
> > > >>
> > > >> Which is very strange... There is only one hunk in that commit that could
> > > >> be considered suspicious:
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > > >> index 9b56490ecbc3..8f5572a9f8f1 100644
> > > >> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > > >> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > > >> @@ -80,9 +80,7 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ahci_pm_ops, ahci_platform_suspend,
> > > >> static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
> > > >> { .compatible = "generic-ahci", },
> > > >> /* Keep the following compatibles for device tree compatibility */
> > > >> - { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", },
> > > >> { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
> > > >> - { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
> > > >> { .compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-ahci", },
> > > >> { .compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci", },
> > > >> { /* sentinel */ }
> > > >>
> > > >> Is your board using one of these compatible string ?
> > > >
> > > > The x15 uses "snps,dwc-ahci". I would expect it to detect the device
> > > > with the new driver if that is loaded, but it's possible that the
> > > > driver does not work on all versions of the dwc-ahci hardware.
> > > >
> > > > Anders, can you provide the boot log from a boot with the new driver
> > > > built in? There should be some messages from dwc-ahci about finding
> > > > the device, but then not ultimately working.
> > > >
> > > > Depending on which way it goes wrong, the safest fallback for 6.1 is
> > > > probably to move the "snps,spear-ahci" and "snps,dwc-ahci" compatible
> > > > strings back into the old driver, and leave the new one only for
> > > > the "baikal,bt1-ahci" implementation of it, until it has been
> > > > successfully verified on TI am5/dra7, spear13xx and exynos.
> > >
> > > OK. So a fix patch until further tests/debug is completed would be this:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_dwc.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_dwc.c
> > > index 8fb66860db31..7a0cbab00843 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_dwc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_dwc.c
> > > @@ -469,8 +469,6 @@ static struct ahci_dwc_plat_data ahci_bt1_plat = {
> > > };
> > >
> > > static const struct of_device_id ahci_dwc_of_match[] = {
> > > - { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", &ahci_dwc_plat },
> > > - { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", &ahci_dwc_plat },
> > > { .compatible = "baikal,bt1-ahci", &ahci_bt1_plat },
> > > {},
> > > };
> > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > > index 8f5572a9f8f1..9b56490ecbc3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
> > > @@ -80,7 +80,9 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ahci_pm_ops, ahci_platform_suspend,
> > > static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "generic-ahci", },
> > > /* Keep the following compatibles for device tree compatibility */
> > > + { .compatible = "snps,spear-ahci", },
> > > { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
> > > + { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
> > > { .compatible = "hisilicon,hisi-ahci", },
> > > { .compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci", },
> > > { /* sentinel */ }
> > >
> > > Anders, Naresh,
> > >
> > > Can you try this ?
> >
>
> > Tested this patch on todays linux-next tag: next-20221014 without enabling
> > CONFIG_AHCI_DWC and it worked as expected when booting [1].
> > On the other hand I also tried a build/boot with CONFIG_AHCI_DWC enabled
> > and it worked as expected to boot [2].
>
> Expected result. The DWC driver will probe the device on our platform
> only while your platform falls back to using the generic driver.
> Anders, in order understand the root cause of the problem could you please
> 1. upload the bogus boot log.
This [1] is the bogus boot log.
> 2. try what I suggested here
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20221014133623.l6w4o7onoyhv2q34@mobilestation/
> and if the system fails to boot at some point upload the boot log.
Only doing this:
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_dwc.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_dwc.c
@@ -316,12 +316,13 @@ static int ahci_dwc_init_host(struct
ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
if (rc)
goto err_disable_resources;
}
-
+/*
ahci_dwc_check_cap(hpriv);
ahci_dwc_init_timer(hpriv);
rc = ahci_dwc_init_dmacr(hpriv);
+*/
if (rc)
goto err_clear_platform;
and enable CONFIG_AHCI_DWC made the mkfs to detect the SATA drive [2].
Cheers,
Anders
[1] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/5634743#L2580
[2] https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/5679278#L2617
