Le 06/10/2022 à 07:45, Damien Le Moal a écrit :
> On 10/6/22 14:17, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> NO_IRQ is used to check the return of irq_of_parse_and_map().
>>
>> On some architecture NO_IRQ is 0, on other architectures it is -1.
>>
>> irq_of_parse_and_map() returns 0 on error, independent of NO_IRQ.
>>
>> So use 0 instead of using NO_IRQ.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Doesn't this need fixes and cc:stable tags ?
I don't think so, because the only user of this driver is powerpc and
powerpc has NO_IRQ set to 0.
I'm sending this because I was to remove NO_IRQ in powerpc in a second step.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c b/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c
>> index 6559b606736d..3ebd6522a1fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c
>> @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static int mpc52xx_ata_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>> udma_mask = ATA_UDMA2 & ((1 << (*prop + 1)) - 1);
>>
>> ata_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
>> - if (ata_irq == NO_IRQ) {
>> + if (!ata_irq) {
>> dev_err(&op->dev, "error mapping irq\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>
