Re: [PATCH 1/2] ata: libata-eh: fix sloppy result type of ata_eh_nr_in_flight()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/18/22 03:16, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> On 6/16/22 11:51 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> 
>> ata_eh_nr_in_flight() counts the # of the active tagged commands and thus
>> cannot return a negative value but the result type is nevertheless *int*;
>> switching it to *unsigned int* (along with the local variables receiving
>> the function's result) helps avoiding the sign extension instructions when
>> comparing with or assigning to *unsigned long *ata_port::fastdrain_cnt and
> 
>    Grr, a typo! Should have been *unsigned long* ata_port::fastdrain_cnt...
> Damien, coyld you please fix it?

OK. Note: please stop using markdown stuff like *xxx*. That is not useful
and that will avoid this kind of typos.

> 
>> thus results in a more compact 64-bit code...
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the SVACE static
>> analysis tool.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
> [...]
> 
> MBR, Sergey


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux