On 5/16/22 2:19 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> The {pio|mwdma|udma}_mask fields of the *struct* ata_device are declared
>> as *unsigned long* (which is a 64-bit type on 64-bit architectures) while
>> the actual masks should easily fit into just 8 bits. The alike fields in
>> the *struct* ata_port are already declared as *unsigned int*, so follow
>> the suit, converting ata_[un]pack_xfermask() as necessary...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@xxxxxx>
[...]
>> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
>> index 1429b7012ae8..f6fc482d767a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/libata.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
>> @@ -677,9 +677,9 @@ struct ata_device {
>> unsigned int cdb_len;
>>
>> /* per-dev xfer mask */
>> - unsigned long pio_mask;
>> - unsigned long mwdma_mask;
>> - unsigned long udma_mask;
>> + unsigned int pio_mask;
>> + unsigned int mwdma_mask;
>> + unsigned int udma_mask;
>
> Ah. OK. So you did this here...
> Hmmm. I would squash these 3 patches into a single one. Otherwise, we have
> sort-of a mess without all patches applied (making revert a pain if needed).
Hm... please explain what kind of a mess... BTW do you really expect a revert?
[...]
MBR, Sergey
