Re: [PATCH v3 10/23] ata: libahci_platform: Parse ports-implemented property in resources getter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/12/22 01:17, Serge Semin wrote:
The ports-implemented property is mainly used on the OF-based platforms
with no ports mapping initialized by a bootloader/BIOS firmware. Seeing
the same of_property_read_u32()-based pattern has already been implemented
in the generic AHCI LLDD (glue) driver and in the Mediatek, St AHCI
drivers let's move the property read procedure to the generic
ahci_platform_get_resources() method. Thus we'll have the forced ports
mapping feature supported for each OF-based platform which requires that,
and stop re-implementing the same pattern in there a bit simplifying the
code.

Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c         | 2 --
  drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c    | 3 ---
  drivers/ata/ahci_st.c          | 3 ---
  drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c | 3 +++
  4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
index 1f6c85fde983..c056378e3e72 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_mtk.c
@@ -118,8 +118,6 @@ static int mtk_ahci_parse_property(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv,
  				   SYS_CFG_SATA_EN);
  	}
- of_property_read_u32(np, "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
-
  	return 0;
  }
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
index 28a8de5b48b9..9b56490ecbc3 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
@@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ static int ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	if (rc)
  		return rc;
- of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
-			     "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
-
  	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "hisilicon,hisi-ahci"))
  		hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_NO_FBS | AHCI_HFLAG_NO_NCQ;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
index 7526653c843b..068621099c00 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_st.c
@@ -168,9 +168,6 @@ static int st_ahci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
st_ahci_configure_oob(hpriv->mmio); - of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
-			     "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
-
  	err = ahci_platform_init_host(pdev, hpriv, &st_ahci_port_info,
  				      &ahci_platform_sht);
  	if (err) {
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
index 4e54e19f07b2..f7f9cac10cb1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
@@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
  		goto err_out;
  	}
+ of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node,
+			     "ports-implemented", &hpriv->force_port_map);
+
  	if (child_nodes) {
  		for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
  			u32 port;

What happens on the other platforms?
Won't they register an error if that property isn't implemented?

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux