Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: ahci: Rename CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY configuration item back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/7/22 01:59, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 21:11
>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers) <linux-
>> ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx; Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: ahci: Rename CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY
>> configuration item back
>>
>> On 4/5/22 05:02, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_MOBILE_POLICY was renamed to
>> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_POLICY in
>>> commit 4dd4d3deb502 ("ata: ahci: Rename
>> CONFIG_SATA_LPM_MOBILE_POLICY
>>> configuration item").
>>>
>>> This caused some pain as users would invisibly lose configuration policy
>>> defaults when they built the new kernel.  To help alleviate that, switch
>>> back to the old name (even if it's wrong).
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> I applied this manually as the "default 3" is from the first patch,
>> which is for 5.19. This one is queued in for-5.18-fixes now. Thanks.
> 
> Ah I didn't realize you were not going to put default 3 in 5.18, otherwise I would
> have re-ordered them.  Sorry.
> 
> Which branch did you push what you've applied so far to?
> I checked libata/for-next and libata/for-5.19 and didn't see anything yet.

I pushed the patch to for-5.18-fixes and will send a PR to Linus tomorrow.
The for-5.19 and for-next branches always are in sync and currently based
on 5.18-rc1. I will rebase them on rc2 next week to have the name revert
in and avoid conflicts.

> 
> As most of my patches recently touch the same code want to me make sure
> any more follow ups work from the right base.

Use 5.19 + the name revert patch for your work. That will correspond to
for-5.19 next week.


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux