Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_of_platform: Use of_irq_to_resource() to populate IRQ resource

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rob,

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:39 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 6:12 PM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
> > allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
> > when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
> > in the node as this bypassed the hierarchical setup and messed up the
> > irq chaining.
> >
> > In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
> > code use of_irq_to_resource().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dropping usage of platform_get_resource() was agreed based on
> > the discussion [0].
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/
> > patch/20211209001056.29774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Prabhakar
> > ---
> >  drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c | 11 ++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
> > index 35aa158fc976..557f349eb533 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/ata_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/libata.h>
> > @@ -25,11 +26,12 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> >         struct device_node *dn = ofdev->dev.of_node;
> >         struct resource io_res;
> >         struct resource ctl_res;
> > -       struct resource *irq_res;
> > +       struct resource irq_res;
> >         unsigned int reg_shift = 0;
> >         int pio_mode = 0;
> >         int pio_mask;
> >         bool use16bit;
> > +       int irq;
> >
> >         ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &io_res);
> >         if (ret) {
> > @@ -45,7 +47,9 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> >         }
> >
> > -       irq_res = platform_get_resource(ofdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> > +       irq = of_irq_to_resource(dn, 0, &irq_res);
>
> No, platform_get_irq() please. I really want to get rid of the 4 users
> of of_irq_to_resource() in the tree, not add more.
>
Ouch I wasn't aware of it.

> Yeah, that means __pata_platform_probe() needs to change, but it's all
> of 2 callers. Really, I think pata_platform.c and pata_of_platform.c
> should be merged. I'm guessing the separation traces back to DT using
> a different bus type.
>
Or we could fill in the IRQ resource by using platform_get_irq()
without touching __pata_platform_probe()?

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux