On 2021/12/11 4:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 04:59:37PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> If 64-bit mask attempt fails, the 32-bit will fail by the very same reason.
>> Don't even try the latter. It's a continuation of the changes that contains,
>> e.g. dcc02c19cc06 ("sata_sil24: use dma_set_mask_and_coherent").
>
> I understand that some people have nothing besides bikeshedding, but this patch
> seems fine to everybody, am I right? Can it be applied (it's independent from
> patch 1 anyways)?
>
Yes, this one seems fine to me. It would be good to get a different review
though (I know hard to get reviews on ata patches...).
I will queue it for 5.17.
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
