On 2021/09/29 21:16, Guo Zhi wrote: > Pointers should be printed with %p or %px rather than cast to > 'unsigned long' and pinted with %lx s/pinted/printed > Change %lx to %p to print the secured pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c > index 2bc5fc81efe3..c32b95f48e50 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c > @@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ static int atp867x_ata_pci_sff_init_host(struct ata_host *host) > #ifdef ATP867X_DEBUG > atp867x_check_ports(ap, i); > #endif > - ata_port_desc(ap, "cmd 0x%lx ctl 0x%lx", > - (unsigned long)ioaddr->cmd_addr, > - (unsigned long)ioaddr->ctl_addr); > - ata_port_desc(ap, "bmdma 0x%lx", > - (unsigned long)ioaddr->bmdma_addr); > + ata_port_desc(ap, "cmd 0x%p ctl 0x%p", > + ioaddr->cmd_addr, > + ioaddr->ctl_addr); > + ata_port_desc(ap, "bmdma 0x%p", > + ioaddr->bmdma_addr); > > mask |= 1 << i; > } > Looks OK to me. But please fix the commit title to: "ata: atp867x: Fix pointer value print" "pointer leak" is too scary for what is only a simple printk problem. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
