On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 06:33:36PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > Add YAML devicetree binding for Mikrotik RB532 PATA controller. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/ata/mikrotek,rb532-pata.yaml | 43 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/mikrotek,rb532-pata.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/mikrotek,rb532-pata.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/mikrotek,rb532-pata.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f74880c4fd82 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/mikrotek,rb532-pata.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/ata/mikrotek,rb532-pata.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Mikrotek RB532 PATA Controller bindings We have a common binding for this (ata/pata-common.yaml). Really, all you'd gain is how to support 2 devices is defined. Should you use that? Is CompactFlash only a single device, I don't remember. If so, is that a limitation for the board or could 2 devices be supported? > + > +maintainers: > + - Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: mikrotik,rb532-pata > + > + reg: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + interrupts: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + gpio: '<name>-gpios' is the preferred form (even for singular). > + maxItems: 1 > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - interrupts > + - gpio > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + cf@18a10000 { > + compatible = "mikrotik,rb532-pata"; > + reg = <0x18a10000 0xc04>; > + > + gpio = <&gpio0 13 0>; > + > + interrupt-parent = <&gpio0>; > + interrupts = <13 0>; > + }; > -- > 2.29.2 >
