On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:43:53AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 4/7/21 10:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:04:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> On 4/7/21 10:03 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >>> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:51:31PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > ... > > > >>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> > >>> Thanks, we need to include bits.h. > >>> (It passed my simple build, but appears I have no such driver included) > >>> > >>> Jens, I saw your message, should I send a follow up fix, or a v2? > >> > >> Let's just drop it, not worth it for the risk imho. > > > > Does it mean I may try again in next cycle? > > > > Because kernel.h inclusion seems to me too wrong there. > > I don't mind taking it, but not on a hunch. If you send something > that has been thought about and went through full compilation, then > you can resend it. Got it! I think allyesconfig would serve a good job. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
