On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:37:11AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > CC Nemoto-san (de-facto TX49XX maintainer) > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:03 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer > <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I couldn't find any buyable product other than reference boards using > > TX49xx CPUs. And since nobody showed interest in keeping support for > > it, it's time to remove it. > > I have an RBTX4927 development board in my board farm, boot-test every > bi-weekly renesas-drivers release on it, and fix kernel issues when they > appear. > > Is that sufficient to keep it? for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then... I wonder whether you have seen my mail about the removal https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20201207105627.GA15866@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and my call for people owning MIPS machines https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/20200227144910.GA25011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Still "unclaimed" machines are IMG Pistachio SoC based boards (MACH_PISTACHIO( Toshiba TX39 series based machines (MACH_TX39XX) NEC VR4100 series based machines (MACH_VR41XX) Netlogic XLR/XLS based systems (NLM_XLR_BOARD) Netlogic XLP based systems (NLM_XLP_BOARD) Sibyte BCM91120C-CRhine (SIBYTE_CRHINE) Sibyte BCM91120x-Carmel (SIBYTE_CARMEL) Sibyte BCM91125C-CRhone (SIBYTE_CRHONE) Sibyte BCM91125E-Rhone (SIBYTE_RHONE) Sibyte BCM91250C2-LittleSur (SIBYTE_LITTLESUR) Sibyte BCM91250E-Sentosa (SIBYTE_SENTOSA) Is there something on this list you also regulary use ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
