On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 08:32:42PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 08:22:36PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > After this, you want me to get rid of kobj_map, right? Or you don't > > care as block doesn't use it anymore? :) > > I have a patch to kill it, but it causes odd regressions with the > tpm driver according to the kernel test. As I have grand plans that > build on the block ѕide of this series for 5.11, I plan to defer the > chardev side and address it for 5.12. Ok, sounds good. Wow, I just looked at the tpm code, and it is, um, "interesting" in how it thinks device lifespans work. Nothing like having 4 different structures with different lifespans embedded within a single structure. Good thing that no one can dynamically remove a TPM device during "normal" operation. greg k-h
