Re: [PATCH 1/2] cmd64x: potential buffer overflow in cmd64x_program_timings()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cmd64x: potential buffer overflow in cmd64x_program_timings()
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:40:42 +0100 (CET)
Cc: linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200107130441.y3owvcnxdljailt5@kili.mountain>
References: <20200107130441.y3owvcnxdljailt5@kili.mountain>

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:04:41 +0300

> The "drive->dn" value is a u8 and it is controlled by root only, but
> it could be out of bounds here so let's check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied.

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] cmd64x: potential buffer overflow in cmd64x_program_timings()
  - From: Dan Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ide: remove unneeded header include path to drivers/ide
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: serverworks: potential overflow in svwks_set_pio_mode()
Previous by thread: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: serverworks: potential overflow in svwks_set_pio_mode()
Next by thread: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cmd64x: potential buffer overflow in cmd64x_program_timings()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems] [Linux SCSI] [Linux RAID] [Git] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Newbie] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux