On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 2:02 PM Stephen Douthit
<stephend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/15/19 3:54 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Commit c312ef176399 "libata/ahci: Drop PCS quirk for Denverton and
> > beyond" got the polarity wrong on the check for which board-ids should
> > have the quirk applied. The board type board_ahci_pcs7 is defined at the
> > end of the list such that "pcs7" boards can be special cased in the
> > future if they need the quirk. All prior Intel board ids "<
> > board_ahci_pcs7" should proceed with applying the quirk.
> >
> > Reported-by: Andreas Friedrich <afrie@xxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Stephen Douthit <stephend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: c312ef176399 ("libata/ahci: Drop PCS quirk for Denverton and beyond")
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/ata/ahci.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> > index dd92faf197d5..05c2b32dcc4d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> > @@ -1600,7 +1600,9 @@ static void ahci_intel_pcs_quirk(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct ahci_host_priv *hp
> > */
> > if (!id || id->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL)
> > return;
>
> Unless I'm missing something this will short-circuit if there are any
> older Intel controllers not explicitly listed with a PCI_VDEVICE entry
> in ahci_pci_tbl. Those will match on:
>
> /* Generic, PCI class code for AHCI */
> { PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_SATA_AHCI, 0xffffff, board_ahci },
You're not missing anything, but I think we should stick with explicit
mapping as only newer controllers tend to match on class id rather
than pci-id, and there's no way to know if that class-id match is for
PCS_6 or PCS_7. Hopefully newer controllers are tested with Linux and
the BIOS fixed prior to the breakage leaking into the wild.
