Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] ata: ahci: mvebu: Add support for A8k legacy DT bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/05/2019 15:30, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The CP110 SATA unit has 2 ports, and a dedicated ICU entry per
> port. In the past, the AHCI SATA driver only supported one interrupt
> per SATA unit. To solve this conflict, the 2 SATA wired interrupts in
> the South-Bridge got configured as 1 GIC interrupt in the
> North-Bridge, regardless of the number of SATA ports actually
> enabled/in use, and the DT bindings only referenced the interrupt of
> one port.
> 
> Since then, this limitation has been addressed and this patch ensures
> backward compatibility with old DTs not describing SATA ports
> correctly directly from the AHCI MVEBU driver. This way, we will be
> able to drop the hack from the ICU driver. IOW, when the A8k
> compatible string is used and there is no sub-nodes in the DT, we
> fake the creation and mapping of the second (missing) interrupt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/ahci_mvebu.c       | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c |  3 +++
>  include/linux/ahci_platform.h  |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_mvebu.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_mvebu.c
> index 8671aa8179fa..8c981b8d6e4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci_mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_mvebu.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mbus.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include "ahci.h"
>  
> @@ -28,9 +29,13 @@
>  #define AHCI_WINDOW_BASE(win)	(0x64 + ((win) << 4))
>  #define AHCI_WINDOW_SIZE(win)	(0x68 + ((win) << 4))
>  
> +#define ICU_SATA0_ICU_ID 109
> +#define ICU_SATA1_ICU_ID 107
> +
>  struct ahci_mvebu_plat_data {
>  	int (*plat_config)(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv, struct device *dev);
>  	unsigned int host_flags;
> +	unsigned int resource_flags;
>  };
>  
>  static void ahci_mvebu_mbus_config(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv,
> @@ -101,6 +106,27 @@ static int ahci_mvebu_armada_3700_config(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv,
>  static int ahci_mvebu_armada_8k_config(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv,
>  				       struct device *dev)
>  {
> +	struct device_node *np = of_irq_find_parent(dev->of_node);
> +	struct irq_data *irqd = irq_get_irq_data(hpriv->irqs[0]);
> +	int host_irq = irqd ? irqd_to_hwirq(irqd) : 0;
> +	int missing_irq = (host_irq == ICU_SATA1_ICU_ID) ?
> +		ICU_SATA0_ICU_ID : ICU_SATA1_ICU_ID;
> +	struct irq_fwspec fwspec = {
> +		.fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(np),
> +		.param_count = 2,
> +		.param = {missing_irq, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH},
> +	};
> +
> +	if (of_get_child_count(dev->of_node))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	hpriv->irqs[1] = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec);
> +	if (hpriv->irqs[1]) {
> +		hpriv->flags |= AHCI_HFLAG_MULTI_MSI;
> +		hpriv->get_irq_vector = ahci_get_per_port_irq_vector;
> +		hpriv->mask_port_map = GENMASK(1, 0);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -200,7 +226,7 @@ static int ahci_mvebu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!pdata)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	hpriv = ahci_platform_get_resources(pdev, 0);
> +	hpriv = ahci_platform_get_resources(pdev, pdata->resource_flags);

This seems to be the only use of resource_flags in the whole series. Why
can't you just pass AHCI_PLATFORM_A8K_QUIRK as a parameter and not
allocate an extra field in the platform data structure?

>  	if (IS_ERR(hpriv))
>  		return PTR_ERR(hpriv);
>  
> @@ -240,6 +266,7 @@ static const struct ahci_mvebu_plat_data ahci_mvebu_armada_3700_plat_data = {
>  
>  static const struct ahci_mvebu_plat_data ahci_mvebu_armada_8k_plat_data = {
>  	.plat_config = ahci_mvebu_armada_8k_config,
> +	.resource_flags = AHCI_PLATFORM_A8K_QUIRK,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id ahci_mvebu_of_match[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> index 347ff14aedd2..620e5f27fdd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci_platform.c
> @@ -484,6 +484,9 @@ struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	if (!child_nodes)
>  		hpriv->nports = 1;
>  
> +	if (!child_nodes && flags & AHCI_PLATFORM_A8K_QUIRK)

Consider using braces around the bitwise operators.

> +		hpriv->nports = 2;
> +
>  	hpriv->phys = devm_kcalloc(dev, hpriv->nports, sizeof(*hpriv->phys), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!hpriv->phys) {
>  		rc = -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/include/linux/ahci_platform.h b/include/linux/ahci_platform.h
> index eaedca5fe6fc..57465ba6bb15 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ahci_platform.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ahci_platform.h
> @@ -44,5 +44,6 @@ int ahci_platform_suspend(struct device *dev);
>  int ahci_platform_resume(struct device *dev);
>  
>  #define AHCI_PLATFORM_GET_RESETS	0x01
> +#define AHCI_PLATFORM_A8K_QUIRK		0x02
>  
>  #endif /* _AHCI_PLATFORM_H */
> 

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux