On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 12:23:15AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 3/8/19 8:18 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:14:06PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> Right, but whoever *interprets* the device masks after the driver has > >>> overridden them should be taking the (smaller) bus mask into account as > >>> well, so the question is where is *that* not being done correctly? > >> > >> Do you have a hint where I should look for that ? > > > > If this a 32-bit ARM platform it might the complete lack of support > > for bus_dma_mask in arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c.. > > It's an ARM 64bit platform, just the PCIe controller is limited to 32bit > address range, so the devices on the PCIe bus cannot read the host's > DRAM above the 32bit limit. arm64 should take the mask into account both for the swiotlb and iommu case. What are the exact symptoms you see? Does it involve swiotlb not kicking in, or iommu issues? What is the exact kernel version?
