Re: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED with Samsung 860 EVO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 15:29 +0000, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> (Also trying linux-ide list)
> 
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 15:25, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I recently purchased a SATA Samsung 860 EVO SSD and put it in an
> > old
> > HP microserver (which has an AMD N36L). By default, when the disk
> > load
> > becomes a little heavy e.g. by running a job like
> > 
> > fio --name=test --readonly --rw=randread --filename /dev/sdb --
> > bs=32k \
> >     --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=32 --direct=1 --runtime=10m --
> > time_based=1
> > 
> > the kernel starts repeatedly producing error messages like:
> > 
> > [ 1177.729912] ata2.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x3c000 SErr 0x0
> > action 0x6 frozen
> > [ 1177.729931] ata2.00: irq_stat 0x08000000, interface fatal error
> > [ 1177.729943] ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> > [ 1177.729962] ata2.00: cmd 61/80:70:80:50:e6/06:00:00:00:00/40 tag
> > 14
> > ncq dma 851968 out
> > [ 1177.729962]          res 40/00:80:00:5a:e6/00:00:00:00:00/40
> > Emask
> > 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> > [ 1177.729978] ata2.00: status: { DRDY }
> > [ 1177.729986] ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> > [ 1177.730002] ata2.00: cmd 61/00:78:00:57:e6/03:00:00:00:00/40 tag
> > 15
> > ncq dma 393216 out
> > [ 1177.730002]          res 40/00:80:00:5a:e6/00:00:00:00:00/40
> > Emask
> > 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> > [ 1177.730017] ata2.00: status: { DRDY }
> > [ 1177.730024] ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> > [ 1177.730039] ata2.00: cmd 61/00:80:00:5a:e6/05:00:00:00:00/40 tag
> > 16
> > ncq dma 655360 out
> > [ 1177.730039]          res 40/00:80:00:5a:e6/00:00:00:00:00/40
> > Emask
> > 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> > [ 1177.730053] ata2.00: status: { DRDY }
> > [ 1177.730060] ata2.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> > [ 1177.730078] ata2.00: cmd 61/00:88:00:5f:e6/01:00:00:00:00/40 tag
> > 17
> > ncq dma 131072 out
> > [ 1177.730078]          res 40/00:80:00:5a:e6/00:00:00:00:00/40
> > Emask
> > 0x10 (ATA bus error)
> > [ 1177.730096] ata2.00: status: { DRDY }
> > [ 1177.730108] ata2: hard resetting link
> > [ 1178.205831] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl
> > 300)
> > [ 1178.206165] ata2.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully
> > accessible
> > [ 1178.209743] ata2.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully
> > accessible
> > [ 1178.212786] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
> > [ 1178.212826] ata2: EH complete
> > [ 1178.212988] ata2.00: Enabling discard_zeroes_data
> > 
> > I tried moving the SSD to another caddy and bay but the issue
> > persists. None of the regular hard disks (a Western Digital and a
> > Seagate) nor the other SSD (a Crucial MX500) already in the system
> > trigger the issue the Samsung 860 EVO does. Adding
> > 
> > libata.force=2.00:noncq
> > 
> > seems to make the issue go away but seemingly at some speed cost
> > (at
> > least compared to what the MX500 achieves). The OS in use is Ubuntu
> > 18.04 with a 4.15.0-43-generic kernel but even a 4.18.0-13-generic
> > had
> > the same issue.
> > 
> > Is there anything software-wise that might need investigating that
> > would allow NCQ to work and a better speed to be reached?
> 
> 

Hello 

I have seen issues reported due to low power delivery to the drive.
However investigating this, its starts with an exception Emask and then
the link error code runs.
Reviewing online some folks are reporting cable issues can cause this
or firmware.
I don't have one to test myself, and you are using an enclosure. Are
you able to connect direct to the motherboard via another cable and
test again.

Regards
Laurence



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux