On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:16:56AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote: > > > Le 07/09/2018 à 21:41, Corentin Labbe a écrit : > > Since setbits32/clrbits32 work on be32, it's better to remove ambiguity on > > the used data type. > > Wouldn't it be better to call them setbits_be32() / clrbits_be32() to > have something looking similar to in_be32() / ou_be32() ? > I agree, I will update the patch. Thanks