On May 22, 2018, at 5:31 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 5/22/18 1:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:09:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>> I think Martin and Christoph are objecting to moving the code to >>>> block/scsi_ioctl.h. I don't care too much about where the code is, but >>>> think it would be nice to have the definitions in a separate header. But >>>> if they prefer just pulling in all of SCSI for it, well then I guess >>>> it's pointless to move the header bits. Seems very heavy handed to me, >>>> though. >>> >>> It might be heavy handed for the 3 remaining users of drivers/ide, >> >> Brutal :-) > > Heh. I noticed a similar sense buffer use in drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c > too. Is this okay under the same considerations? This is going from somewhat crazy to pretty nuts, imho. I guess in practical terms it doesn’t matter that much, since most folks would be using sr. I still think a split would be vastly superior. Just keep the scsi code in drivers/scsi/ and make it independently selectable. Jens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
