Re: [PATCH 0/5] libata fixes and improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun,

On 5/11/18 03:43, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:28:07AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> [resending with numbered patches in subject]
>>
>> This series introduces fixes and imrpovements of libata.
>>
>> The first patch is a comment typo fix and the second improves the handling of
>> ATA error status bits in ata_err_string().
>> The third and fourth patches reduce libata verbosity by honoring requests quiet
>> flags in error handling as well as reducing the output from ata_dev_set_mode().
>>
>> Finally, the last patch improves failed request retry handling by relying on the
>> scsi layer decisions for failed requests with valid sense data.
>>
>> Damien Le Moal (5):
>>   libata: Fix comment typo in ata_eh_analyze_tf()
>>   libata: Fix ata_err_string()
>>   libata: Make ata_dev_set_mode() less verbose
>>   libata: Honor RQF_QUIET flag
>>   libata: Fix command retry decision
> 
> Applied 1-5 to libata/for-4.18.
> 
> Thanks.

I forgot to add a CC:stable for patch 5. I think that it is worthwhile
to have that patch in stable too. What do you think ?
Having the other patches in stable would be nice too, but I leave that
decision to you.

Thanks !

Best regards.

-- 
Damien Le Moal,
Western Digital��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��'^�)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux