On 05/09/2018 02:28 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
For failed commands with valid sense data (e.g. NCQ commands),
scsi_check_sense() is used in ata_analyze_tf() to determine if the
command can be retried. In such case, rely on this decision and ignore
the command error mask based decision done in ata_worth_retry().
This fixes useless retries of commands such as unaligned writes on zoned
disks (TYPE_ZAC).
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index ccaed93985bb..816388df72a6 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -2237,12 +2237,16 @@ static void ata_eh_link_autopsy(struct ata_link *link)
if (qc->err_mask & ~AC_ERR_OTHER)
qc->err_mask &= ~AC_ERR_OTHER;
- /* SENSE_VALID trumps dev/unknown error and revalidation */
+ /*
+ * SENSE_VALID trumps dev/unknown error and revalidation. Upper
+ * layers will determine whether the command is worth retrying
+ * based on the sense data and device class/type. Otherwise,
+ * determine directly if the command is worth retrying using its
+ * error mask and flags.
+ */
if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_SENSE_VALID)
qc->err_mask &= ~(AC_ERR_DEV | AC_ERR_OTHER);
-
- /* determine whether the command is worth retrying */
- if (ata_eh_worth_retry(qc))
+ else if (ata_eh_worth_retry(qc))
qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_RETRY;
/* accumulate error info */
Ah. That was what I intended with the original ATA sense handling
implementation, but never got around doing it properly.
Thanks for fixing it up.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
