On 2018-05-07 08:49:08 [-0700], Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Sebastian. > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:06:20PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > ata_sff_data_xfer_noirq() is invoked via the ->sff_data_xfer hook. The > > latter is invoked by ata_pio_sector(), atapi_send_cdb() and > > __atapi_pio_bytes() which in turn is invoked by ata_sff_hsm_move(). > > The latter function requires that the "ap->lock" lock is held which > > needs to be taken with disabled interrupts. > > > > There is no need have to have ata_sff_data_xfer_noirq() which invokes > > ata_sff_data_xfer32() with disabled interrupts because at this point the > > interrupts are already disabled. > > Remove the function and its references to it and replace all callers > > with ata_sff_data_xfer32(). > > Can you please add irq disabled assert to ata_sff_data_xfer*()? Why irq-disabled assert? Can we use lockdep_assert_held() instead? > Thanks. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
