We previously had a check to see if the device has support for
prioritized ncq commands and a check to see if a device flag
is set, through a sysfs variable, in order to send a prioritized
command.
This patch only allows the sysfs variable to be set if the device
supports prioritized commands enabling one check in ata_build_rw_tf
in order to determine whether or not to send a prioritized command.
This patch depends on ata: ATA Command Priority Disabled By Default
Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 +--
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index b294339..43842fd 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -787,8 +787,7 @@ int ata_build_rw_tf(struct ata_taskfile *tf, struct ata_device *dev,
if (tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_FUA)
tf->device |= 1 << 7;
- if ((dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO) &&
- (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE)) {
+ if (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE) {
if (class == IOPRIO_CLASS_RT)
tf->hob_nsect |= ATA_PRIO_HIGH <<
ATA_SHIFT_PRIO;
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 87597a3..831beea 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -323,8 +323,14 @@ static ssize_t ata_ncq_prio_enable_store(struct device *device,
goto unlock;
}
- if (input)
+ if (input) {
+ if (!(dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO)) {
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE;
+ }
else
dev->flags &= ~ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_PRIO_ENABLE;
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
