On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:44:20AM +0900, Jaedon Shin wrote: > Add offsets for 40nm BMIPS based set-top box platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c b/drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c > index 41c7535d706b..1cc80743b1b6 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c > @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ > #define MAX_PORTS 2 > > /* Register offset between PHYs in PCB space */ > -#define SATA_MDIO_REG_SPACE_SIZE 0x1000 > +#define SATA_MDIO_REG_28NM_SPACE_SIZE 0x1000 > +#define SATA_MDIO_REG_40NM_SPACE_SIZE 0x10 Hmm, I thought there were other differences than just the offsets between ports when rev'ing from 40nm to 28nm. But revisiting the only documentation I have [1], this looks OK. I'd recommend double checking the other registers, even if they're currently unused though. > > struct brcm_sata_port { > int portnum; > @@ -47,7 +48,7 @@ struct brcm_sata_phy { > struct brcm_sata_port phys[MAX_PORTS]; > }; > > -enum sata_mdio_phy_regs_28nm { > +enum sata_mdio_phy_regs { > PLL_REG_BANK_0 = 0x50, > PLL_REG_BANK_0_PLLCONTROL_0 = 0x81, > > @@ -85,7 +86,7 @@ static void brcm_sata_mdio_wr(void __iomem *addr, u32 bank, u32 ofs, > #define FMAX_VAL_DEFAULT 0x3df > #define FMAX_VAL_SSC 0x83 > > -static void brcm_sata_cfg_ssc_28nm(struct brcm_sata_port *port) > +static void brcm_sata_cfg_ssc(struct brcm_sata_port *port) > { > void __iomem *base = brcm_sata_phy_base(port); > struct brcm_sata_phy *priv = port->phy_priv; > @@ -116,19 +117,25 @@ static int brcm_sata_phy_init(struct phy *phy) > { > struct brcm_sata_port *port = phy_get_drvdata(phy); > > - brcm_sata_cfg_ssc_28nm(port); > + brcm_sata_cfg_ssc(port); > > return 0; > } > > -static const struct phy_ops phy_ops_28nm = { > +static const struct phy_ops phy_ops = { > .init = brcm_sata_phy_init, > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }; > > static const struct of_device_id brcm_sata_phy_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sata-phy", > - .data = (void *)SATA_MDIO_REG_SPACE_SIZE }, > + .data = (void *)SATA_MDIO_REG_28NM_SPACE_SIZE }, > + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7346-sata-phy", > + .data = (void *)SATA_MDIO_REG_40NM_SPACE_SIZE }, > + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7360-sata-phy", > + .data = (void *)SATA_MDIO_REG_40NM_SPACE_SIZE }, > + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7362-sata-phy", > + .data = (void *)SATA_MDIO_REG_40NM_SPACE_SIZE }, Like Florian suggested, this should probably be consolidated to the first SoC that had this core on it. I think bcm7425, but I could be wrong. > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, brcm_sata_phy_of_match); > @@ -185,7 +192,7 @@ static int brcm_sata_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > port = &priv->phys[id]; > port->portnum = id; > port->phy_priv = priv; > - port->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, child, &phy_ops_28nm); > + port->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, child, &phy_ops); > port->ssc_en = of_property_read_bool(child, "brcm,enable-ssc"); > if (IS_ERR(port->phy)) { > dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n"); > -- > 2.6.2 > With that: Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx> [1] https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux-3.8/blob/master/linux/drivers/ata/sata_brcmstb_phy.c https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux-3.8/blob/master/linux/drivers/ata/sata_brcmstb.h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html