On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote: > On Sunday 22 February 2015 21:53:35 Gabriele Mazzotta wrote: > > It seems that the following patch prevents errors when the policy is > > changed. Could anybody explain why? The device is generating a spurious PHY event after LPM state change and the patch is ignoring the event once after state change. It's a bit too specific. Maybe we should do this timeout-based - e.g. ignore phy events for 1s after LPM state change. Gabriele, would be interested in making such changes? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
