On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Quentin Lambert wrote: > > > On 09/04/2015 14:36, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >Oh. They're not GFP_ATOMIC. > > > >Fold these two patches together into one patch and resend. > The reason I did it that way is because I feel that the two patches > really are different. > The first one do not change the execution of the code but the second > one does. > Could you explain to me why they can be folded into one ? When I read the first patch it left me with unanswered questions and I was planning to ask you to redo it. After you had fixed 1/1 there is no need for 2/2. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
