On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:37:43AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Thursday 02 April 2015 07:58 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:31:40AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >>On Saturday 28 March 2015 05:58 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > >>>On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:29:44AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >>>>On Thursday 19 March 2015 06:53 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > >>>>>+static struct phy *brcm_sata_phy_xlate(struct device *dev, > >>>>>+ struct of_phandle_args *args) > >>>>>+{ > >>>>>+ struct brcm_sata_phy *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>>>+ int i = args->args[0]; > >>>>>+ > >>>>>+ if (i >= MAX_PORTS || !priv->phys[i].phy) { > >>>>>+ dev_err(dev, "invalid phy: %d\n", i); > >>>>>+ return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > >>>>>+ } > >>>>>+ > >>>>>+ return priv->phys[i].phy; > >>>>>+} > >>>> > >>>>this xlate is not required at all if the controller device tree node has > >>>>phandle to the phy node (sub node) instead of the phy provider device tree > >>>>node. > >>> > >>>That doesn't match any convention I see in existing SATA phy bindings, > >>>nor do I see how the existing of_phy_simple_xlate() would support this, > >>>unless I instantiate a device for each port's PHY. If I adjust the > >>>device tree as you suggest, and use of_phy_simple_xlate() instead of > >>>this, of_phy_get() can't find the PHY provider, because the provider is > >>>registered to the parent, not the subnode. > >> > >>The phy core should still be able to get the PHY provider. > >>See this in of_phy_provider_lookup > >> for_each_child_of_node(phy_provider->dev->of_node, child) > >> if (child == node) > >> return phy_provider; > > > >That just searches for children of the node. It doesn't walk parent > >nodes. > > okay.. in your phy_create pass the np of the PHYs (sub-node pointer > to phy provider). Ah, I see. I completely passed over the 2nd parameter to phy_create()... Thanks for the tip. > >>Can you post your device tree node here? > > > >You mean patch 5? > > > >https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/18/937 > > > >>> > >>>Can you elaborate on your suggestion? > > Change the dt node to something like below.. [snip] Yes, that worked. Thanks. OK, I'll fix this up and send out v2 shortly. Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html