On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:13:08PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > Jens notes, "libata tag allocator sucks. Like seriously sucks, it's > almost a worst case implementation." Previously I thought SATA mmio > latency dominated performance profiles, but as Tejun notes: > > "Hmmm... one problem with the existing tag allocator in ata is that > it's not very efficient which actually shows up in profile when libata > is used with a very zippy SSD. Given that ata needs a different > allocation policies anyway maybe the right thing to do is making the > existing allocator suck less." > > So replace it with a naive enhancement that also supports the existing > quirks. Hopefully, soon to be replaced by Shaohua's patches [1], but > those do not yet support the quirk needed by sil24 (ATA_FLAG_LOWTAG) > [2]. > > [1]: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://marc.info/?l%3Dlinux-ide%26m%3D142137195324687%26w%3D2&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=3RFlL12A7nwmLRXunVJq2g%3D%3D%0A&m=5iyIBsm0XLUeBFFdEfPvaP6LL8KiN2TcuEGgJH6RzTc%3D%0A&s=cea914a77883ea668400a1f19621d1241cab16f6a4c0e68d0749de4c2448cdb1 > [2]: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id%3D87101&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=3RFlL12A7nwmLRXunVJq2g%3D%3D%0A&m=5iyIBsm0XLUeBFFdEfPvaP6LL8KiN2TcuEGgJH6RzTc%3D%0A&s=82d11bc720e9f0cbd0ad6aa7e8ece18315ac1e4f97cb02d49460893e5006228e with my patch, we can fix this as: diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c index d81b20d..5242897 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template sil24_sht = { .can_queue = SIL24_MAX_CMDS, .sg_tablesize = SIL24_MAX_SGE, .dma_boundary = ATA_DMA_BOUNDARY, + .tag_alloc_policy = BLK_TAG_ALLOC_FIFO, }; static struct ata_port_operations sil24_ops = { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
