On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:59:36AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > I still don't understand what we get by adding this new allocator > besides complexity, am I missing something? Hmmm... one problem with the existing tag allocator in ata is that it's not very efficient which actually shows up in profile when libata is used with a very zippy SSD. Given that ata needs a different allocation policies anyway maybe the right thing to do is making the existing allocator suck less. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
