Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] libata: use blk taging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:28:36AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> libata on the other hand at the moment assigns it's own tags,
> which are only stored in struct ata_queued_cmd, but never in the
> request. libata assigns tags per ata_host.  Each ata_host

Per ata_port.

> might have multiple ports, which each get their own Scsi_Host
> allocated.
>
> Given that ATA NCQ has a fairly low queue depth I assume we want
> to stick to assigning ATA tags per-device, but due to the host
> per device scheme libata that even works using scsi-mq. (Q: how do tags
> work when port mulipliers are involved?)

It's still per-port.  The same number of tags are shared among all
devices attached via PMs.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux