-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 12/03/2014 10:35 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Phillip> OEM product requirements documents and supply contracts > sound Phillip> like forms of writing to me. > > Except they are not forms of writing that we as a community have > access to. So your assertion is that you have seen it in writing, so we should all assume the drives will adhere to that, but the writing is private and can not be verified and the manufacturers can not be held to it if they choose not to abide by it in the general case, but we should assume that if they are bound by private contracts, that they would perform the same way with publically sold models that claim to have the same model and revision? I'm not saying a hard hell no, but this certainly makes me uncomfortable. I'd much rather see the manufacturers put it in writing that yes, this make and model will perform this way even though it is not strictly required by ATA8. What would be better still is if the bloody ATA standard got a clue and said that if the drive claims that it does in fact zero after TRIM, that the TRIM command becomes mandatory instead of advisory. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUf+W5AAoJENRVrw2cjl5RObkIAIRy29u8cx1Ejp2gOr01oWn/ tV+Qj0gpgGzcazKDJWpDK5sxboDteoFl+UiI1/1yEPE+dfvwT26ryyqWKsNjTUDb YcwkT3zn7wgUbloL3yx4WqNZnM9/vDDv1mh94bjdIjZM2iUOpoZj81iGVaKWHIFC I/qXf5eeHGrPtHBUzdEyAgVtd4pc1dN2zo4KZmwA3Xfj6zxq3knsASE4fgiFuegv iyC5PvqXN1z14P2f+6/EhT2Ls1Vzo0Y/pnxZstEexftjWG6a4rbaEZVFT/fxawgn nAqaB0GxvLpD5tSmUKUWtAYFDSWOUP+MIFyPvm0A8V1pLrLQV81PrKZ2qHMKvMU= =dFFk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
