On 16 August 2014 17:07, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 03:47:17PM +0530, Arjun Sreedharan wrote:
>> scc_bus_softreset not necessarily should return zero.
>> Propagate the error code.
>> Signed-off-by: Arjun Sreedharan <arjun024@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/ata/pata_scc.c | 9 ++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c b/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
>> index 4e006d7..5618c4518 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
>> @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static int scc_wait_after_reset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned int devmask,
>> * Note: Original code is ata_bus_softreset().
>> */
>>
>> -static unsigned int scc_bus_softreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int devmask,
>> +static int scc_bus_softreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int devmask,
>> unsigned long deadline)
>> {
>> struct ata_ioports *ioaddr = &ap->ioaddr;
>> @@ -599,9 +599,7 @@ static unsigned int scc_bus_softreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int devmask,
>
> scc_bus_softreset() should return int too, right?
I have changed it from unsigned int to int for better clarity since
scc_wait_after_reset() could
return negative errnos. Any issues ??
>
>> udelay(20);
>> out_be32(ioaddr->ctl_addr, ap->ctl);
>>
>> - scc_wait_after_reset(&ap->link, devmask, deadline);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + return scc_wait_after_reset(&ap->link, devmask, deadline);
>> }
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -618,7 +616,8 @@ static int scc_softreset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned int *classes,
>> {
>> struct ata_port *ap = link->ap;
>> unsigned int slave_possible = ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS;
>> - unsigned int devmask = 0, err_mask;
>> + unsigned int devmask = 0;
>> + int err_mask;
>
> @rc or @ret would be a better name for it.
rc would be better. yes. will do.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
