On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:42:03AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > One more thing. > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Antoine Ténart wrote: > > This introduce a new way of defining SATA ports in the device tree, with > > one port per sub-node. This as the advantage of allowing a per port > > configuration. Because some ports may be accessible but disabled in the > > device tree, the default port_map is computed automatically when using > > this. > > Any chance the old one phy config can be moved over to this scheme so > that we don't have to carry two separate mechanisms? That would break the DT ABI. Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
