Re: [PATCH #upstream] libata: implement dump_id force param

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun,

I understand.  We have moved buildings since 2010 and I do not know whether I can find the CF cards that had the problem.  I have a deadline in 3 weeks that I must work on.  I will follow up with you after that.

Thank you,

Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
baker@xxxxxxxx



On 1 Jul 2014, at 1:51 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Hello, Larry.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:51:54AM -0700, Larry Baker wrote:
>> I see what happened.  Tejun sent me two sets of patches: one to
>> implement the driver dump_id kernel parameter and the other to fix
>> the problem with the buggy CF card.  (It lies that it supports ATA
>> MULTI -- which is actually required by the standard!)  Jeff only saw
>> the first set, which is what he applied.  They are in the current
>> Linux source tree.  What are missing are the patches to recover from
>> multi-block transfer failures by falling back to use single-block
>> transfers.  Here's Tejun's e-mail to me with those patches (ready to
>> go?).
> 
> I dug out the original patch.  It looks like I was waiting for
> Tested-by.  Has anyone tested the patch at the time?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux